Sanding is an inescapable part of the woodworking process and just like any other craft, working with good tools makes all the difference! A good sandpaper is tough, durable, and effective. It’ll remove a ton of material while leaving a consistent and minimal scratch pattern so you can enjoy that beautifully smooth and even surface on your wood projects.
There’s an ocean of products to choose from so I’ve spent four days testing 19 papers with a special robot arm to help you navigate this ocean!
Discover my top 3 picks for performance and durability in 2021 below.
WHAT'S NEW IN THE INDUSTRY?
In the past few years, there’s been a lot of innovation in the sandpaper industry. For example, Mirka Ltd. no longer holds a patent on the mesh disc, allowing other companies to experiment with this design. Mesh abrasives can cut faster and longer than traditional sandpapers by preventing crud buildup on the cutting surface.
Some developers have also begun to change the formula and alumina zirconia (ceramic) has become an interesting choice for the woodworker. Though better known as an abrasive for metalworking, some manufacturers create ceramic or ceramic blends for woodworking. This is because ceramic grains break evenly while constantly exposing fresh cutting edges.
HOW I CONDUCTED THE TEST
Because sandpaper is consumable, the only true test of value is durability. How long can you use it? How much cutting can it do? Those are the essential questions that you need to ask before investing your money in a product. In the long run, a cheap sandpaper that won’t last for very long will be more costly to use than an expensive abrasive that continues to work well over an extensive period.
To determine the durability and performance of different sandpapers, I conducted a friability test. The term ‘friability’ refers to the breakdown of an abrasive when heat or pressure is applied. The amount of breakdown determines the friability rate. Highly friable sandpapers break down easily, constantly creating new, sharp surfaces, while a low friability abrasive more quickly becomes dull or round.
To ensure that I achieved precise and accurate test results, I enlisted the help of industrial robots from my friends over at ATI Industrial Automation. These orbital robotic sanders could deliver the same amount of pressure throughout the whole testing period of four days! Every sandpaper tested was a five-inch disc with a 120 grit to which I applied 10.78 pounds of force through robotic pressure. I tested every abrasive for five 5-minute intervals, weighing the boards after every interval to determine the number of grams removed.
I tested the sanding capacity of every disc on red oak, which measures a 1290 ft-lb (pound-force) on the Janka scale: a hardness test that determines the resistance of different woods to denting and wear.
To determine a winner, I looked for a combination of affordability and cutting capacity. To calculate this, I divided the cost of the individual discs by the total grams of wood removed.
MY TOP 3 PICKS FOR 2021
1. The Newcomer That Whooped Everyone: 3M Xtract™ CUBITRON
This 3M Cubitron Mesh abrasive utilizes a mesh pattern that prevents buildup and allows for a cooler sanding process. Combined with the consistent breakage of ceramic grains, this design offers the best of two worlds! The 3M Cubitron Mesh sandpaper removed over 40 grams more material than the runner-up! It was also the second cheapest abrasive among all the brands tested.
2. The Runner Up: 3M CUBITRON
Slightly more expensive but utilizing a more durable film backing, the regular 3M Cubitron still gets the job done. The Norton Mesh Power abrasive achieved almost the same result as the regular 3M Cubitron in grams removed (76 vs. 74). The Norton abrasive also contains a ceramic formula, but because it’s on the pricier side ($1.70 per disc), it fell way down in the ranking to spot no #10.
3. Third Place: Klingspor PS77
Klingspor made it into the top 3 because of its low price. However, the overall performance of this sandpaper in terms of grams removed landed on the average number of 40. The material, aluminum oxide, is the traditional formula used for industrial sanders and it’ll get the job done just fine. However, if you want to speed up your tedious sanding sessions, 3M Cubitron is the way to go.
What do you think of our results? So you agree with our rankings? Disagree?
Let us know in the comments below!
I’d love to hear what’s worked for you.
We’re here for you. If you have any questions or need customer service, you can email us at support@kmtools.com.
As always, STAY SAFE IN THE SHOP!
8 comments
Barak
I have had similar issues as a commenter above. The grit on the 3M Cubitron lasts forever. However, the backing does not. It will last for a little while, but usually after I peel the sandpaper off the sander the first time, it will not stick very long at all the second time around. If they won’t stick to the sander, then it really doesn’t matter how long the grit lasts because it’s unusable. Not worth the money in my opinion.
I have had similar issues as a commenter above. The grit on the 3M Cubitron lasts forever. However, the backing does not. It will last for a little while, but usually after I peel the sandpaper off the sander the first time, it will not stick very long at all the second time around. If they won’t stick to the sander, then it really doesn’t matter how long the grit lasts because it’s unusable. Not worth the money in my opinion.
Kane
A few observations.
I have a bunch of oak panels to finish and have been playing with my new Festool sander when I came across the video on YouTube. Till now, I’ve been using discs that came with the sander, and Mirka Abranet that had been recommended by the store from which I purchased the sander. Definitely prefer the mesh. This week, I got a test pack of this 3M product, and notice the results are significantly different for the same grit product.
After sanding with the same grits (80 pop 120) the Mirka product feels significantly smoother, less ‘hairy’. Taking a stab at it, it seems like the profiled grains provided by 3M score into the wood, whereas the Mirka cuts. Also, wiping my hand over a sanded panel, the 3M seems to leave quite a bit more dust. Been fiddling away from the ‘standard’ setting to find something that works.
During the sanding process, you definitely feel the 3M product dig into the wood, wobbling the sander around more than Mirka or Festool product.
Going to fiddle with it some more to see if I can work out a process, since the price differential — less time swapping out paper means more of my time spent actually sanding, is significant.
A few observations.
I have a bunch of oak panels to finish and have been playing with my new Festool sander when I came across the video on YouTube. Till now, I’ve been using discs that came with the sander, and Mirka Abranet that had been recommended by the store from which I purchased the sander. Definitely prefer the mesh. This week, I got a test pack of this 3M product, and notice the results are significantly different for the same grit product.
After sanding with the same grits (80 pop 120) the Mirka product feels significantly smoother, less ‘hairy’. Taking a stab at it, it seems like the profiled grains provided by 3M score into the wood, whereas the Mirka cuts. Also, wiping my hand over a sanded panel, the 3M seems to leave quite a bit more dust. Been fiddling away from the ‘standard’ setting to find something that works.
During the sanding process, you definitely feel the 3M product dig into the wood, wobbling the sander around more than Mirka or Festool product.
Going to fiddle with it some more to see if I can work out a process, since the price differential — less time swapping out paper means more of my time spent actually sanding, is significant.
David
Terrific review! Given that your top discs, the 3m Xtract did so well in speed of removal, durability, and cost per gram removed, it makes little difference, but perhaps more emphasis on wood removed in first 5 minutes, and total time could be more useful. As you say, if time is unimportant, then we are only looking at cost per gram removed. However, “time is money” and for those of us who value our time, sell our work, or even pay employees, cost per gram might be less important than grams per minute. Even paying for expensive discs and changing frequently could be cheaper if one is paying for labor, but can cut sanding time.
Terrific review! Given that your top discs, the 3m Xtract did so well in speed of removal, durability, and cost per gram removed, it makes little difference, but perhaps more emphasis on wood removed in first 5 minutes, and total time could be more useful. As you say, if time is unimportant, then we are only looking at cost per gram removed. However, “time is money” and for those of us who value our time, sell our work, or even pay employees, cost per gram might be less important than grams per minute. Even paying for expensive discs and changing frequently could be cheaper if one is paying for labor, but can cut sanding time.
Jim
Your tests were very interesting, and it is great of you to share the results on this blog.
If you are open to a suggestion: the chart with the results is a bit confusing, because you have the “total (grams) removed” number right next to the “cost per gram removed” bar. Would it not be clearer to have either “number / its bar / other number / other bar” or “number / bar / other bar / other number” ?
Your tests were very interesting, and it is great of you to share the results on this blog.
If you are open to a suggestion: the chart with the results is a bit confusing, because you have the “total (grams) removed” number right next to the “cost per gram removed” bar. Would it not be clearer to have either “number / its bar / other number / other bar” or “number / bar / other bar / other number” ?
Meryl
I’m using the winner 3M Cubitron Mesh abrasive on a Metabo and I am having zero issues. In fact, this stuff us kind of surreal how fast it removes material and how long it lasts. 5-inch.
I’m using the winner 3M Cubitron Mesh abrasive on a Metabo and I am having zero issues. In fact, this stuff us kind of surreal how fast it removes material and how long it lasts. 5-inch.
Mark
Somewhere in the video you mentioned you could buy a certain brand of sandpaper a few at a time rom an individual. Could you tell me just what brand and link to that person please?
Somewhere in the video you mentioned you could buy a certain brand of sandpaper a few at a time rom an individual. Could you tell me just what brand and link to that person please?
Steven Elves
I’ve never had an issue with discs sticking. I’ve got a couple different brands of sander (Ryobi and Black & Decker) and they cling as if they were glued on.
I’ve never had an issue with discs sticking. I’ve got a couple different brands of sander (Ryobi and Black & Decker) and they cling as if they were glued on.
BRAD NAILOR
Based on this review, I went out and bought quite a supply of the 3M Xtract Cubitron discs. They do sand well and the dust collection is great, but they are basically unusable because they will not stick to my sanders. I’ve tried several sanders, including a brand new Festool. Even with a fresh disc and after blowing the dust off the pad, the discs will not stick. They wander off center and go flying across the room when you lift the sander off the work piece. What’s the deal here, will these only work with 3M sanders? Thank you.
Based on this review, I went out and bought quite a supply of the 3M Xtract Cubitron discs. They do sand well and the dust collection is great, but they are basically unusable because they will not stick to my sanders. I’ve tried several sanders, including a brand new Festool. Even with a fresh disc and after blowing the dust off the pad, the discs will not stick. They wander off center and go flying across the room when you lift the sander off the work piece. What’s the deal here, will these only work with 3M sanders? Thank you.